Skip to content

docs(af01): close trusted development baseline - #52

Merged
TheHalfMoon merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
docs/af01-canonical-closeout
Aug 27, 2026
Merged

docs(af01): close trusted development baseline#52
TheHalfMoon merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
docs/af01-canonical-closeout

Conversation

@TheHalfMoon

@TheHalfMoon TheHalfMoon commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

AF-01 canonical closeout candidate

Canonical base:

main: 652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028
tree: 6b98c5582f40681ac9049451025486bbdd1de4fa
PR #51: MERGED
T054: COMPLETE
T055: COMPLETE
T056: OPEN

Exact candidate head:

head: 57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1

This is a docs-only AF-01 closeout candidate. It changes exactly two repository paths:

A specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md
M specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/tasks.md

It changes no Rust source, workflow, dependency, lockfile, security policy, ruleset intent, oracle identity, frozen corpus, or runtime behavior.

T054

Records the exact convergence-head temporal qualification for ae8967a933832c4331d895f6389a9e086c23e661, including five successful path-applicable workflows, required-context uniqueness/provenance, retained artifacts, clean Qodo/CodeRabbit truth, and zero unresolved substantive review threads.

T055

Records convergence PR #51 merge and post-merge canonical verification:

merge/main: 652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028
tree: 6b98c5582f40681ac9049451025486bbdd1de4fa
post-merge assurance run: 33079909197 — SUCCESS
post-merge Scorecard run: 33079909183 — SUCCESS
assurance artifact: 9649667139
AF01_ASSURANCE_SHA256: e1359325c5be4bd93cd4833d9cc51bdde6ecb1d5f440b2c30ef68b248ce833e1

The live assurance and review-governance rulesets remain active on refs/heads/main with the reviewed semantics.

T056

T056 remains deliberately open in the task ledger. This exact docs-only closeout head must independently receive path-applicable CI and fresh Qodo/CodeRabbit truth with zero unresolved substantive findings, then merge with an exact expected-head guard. Only after post-merge canonical main and live policy are re-read may repository truth classify:

AF-01=CLOSED_CANONICAL

No closure claim is made by the candidate itself.


Summary by cubic

Adds the AF-01 canonical closeout record and updates the task ledger, marking T054 and T055 complete with post-merge verification evidence. Docs-only: no product source, workflow, dependency, or live policy behavior changes.

  • Records the convergence-head qualification, PR docs(af01): converge trusted development baseline #51 merge, and post-merge assurance and Scorecard runs with retained artifact digests.
  • Explains why future temporal identifiers stay in the PR conversation rather than the commit: committing them would create a new SHA and invalidate the recorded evidence.
  • T056 remains open: the exact docs-only closeout head must itself qualify and merge before AF-01=CLOSED_CANONICAL may be classified.

Written for commit 65d44c9. Summary will update on new commits.

Review in cubic

@qodo-code-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

ⓘ Your Qodo trial ends soon. Ask your workspace admin to set up billing to keep reviews running after the trial. Manage billing

@greptile-apps greptile-apps Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your trial has ended. Reactivate Greptile to resume code reviews.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d62554ab-b791-4adb-b83e-56a65dc85e45


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@qodo-code-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Grey Divider

Great, no issues found!

Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require review

Grey Divider

Tip of the day
💡 Did you know, you can ask Qodo to dismiss a finding you disagree with, with your reason on record

More tips ↗ | Customize Qodo ↗ | Qodo docs ↗

Grey Divider

Qodo Logo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@qodo review

Please perform a fresh review of exact AF-01 closeout head 57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1. Focus on evidence correctness, task-state truth, T054/T055 provenance, non-circular T056 sequencing, live-ruleset claims, product-semantic freeze, and false-CLOSED_CANONICAL risk. Report every substantive issue; do not treat unavailable evidence as PASS.

@qodo-code-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary by Qodo

Document AF-01 canonical closeout evidence

📝 Documentation 🕐 20-40 Minutes

Grey Divider

AI Description

• Records exact-head convergence qualification and retained CI, review, and artifact evidence.
• Verifies PR #51 merge, canonical tree, post-merge assurance, and active rulesets.
• Completes T054/T055 while preserving T056 as the final canonical closeout gate.
Diagram

graph TD
  A["Convergence Evidence"] --> B["T054 Qualified"] --> C["T055 Verified"] --> D{"T056 Complete?"}
  D -->|No| E["Closeout Candidate"]
  D -->|Yes| F["Closed Canonical"]
Loading
High-Level Assessment

The docs-only evidence record plus an explicitly open T056 gate is the appropriate approach. Marking AF-01 closed within this candidate was considered but correctly avoided because canonical closure depends on this exact head independently qualifying, merging unchanged, and receiving post-merge policy verification.

Files changed (2) +251 / -3

Documentation (2) +251 / -3
closeout.mdRecord AF-01 canonical closeout evidence +236/-0

Record AF-01 canonical closeout evidence

• Adds the closeout candidate record for T054 and T055, including exact-head workflow and review qualification, retained artifacts, convergence merge identity, post-merge assurance, Scorecard evidence, and live ruleset read-back. Defines the remaining T056 qualification and unchanged-merge requirements without claiming canonical closure prematurely.

specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md

tasks.mdReconcile AF-01 final task state +15/-3

Reconcile AF-01 final task state

• Advances the ledger to CLOSEOUT_CANDIDATE and marks T054 and T055 complete with supporting evidence references. Keeps T056 open until this exact closeout candidate qualifies, merges unchanged, and is verified on canonical main.

specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/tasks.md

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@coderabbitai full review

Please perform a fresh full review of exact AF-01 closeout head 57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1. Focus on evidence correctness, task-state truth, T054/T055 provenance, non-circular T056 sequencing, live-ruleset claims, product-semantic freeze, and false-CLOSED_CANONICAL risk. Report every substantive issue.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@TheHalfMoon: I will perform a fresh full review of PR #52 at 57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1. I will check the specified evidence, task states, provenance, sequencing, live-policy claims, product-semantic freeze, and any false CLOSED_CANONICAL claim.

⚠️ Action not completed

Review rate limited.


Your included review limit is currently reached under our Fair Usage Limits Policy. This review may still proceed through usage-based billing if eligible. Your next included review will be available in 3 minutes.

@qodo-code-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

review

Please perform a fresh review of exact AF-01 closeout head 57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1. Focus on evidence correctness, task-state truth, T054/T055 provenance, non-circular T056 sequencing, live-ruleset claims, product-semantic freeze, and false-CLOSED_CANONICAL risk. Report every substantive issue; do not treat unavailable evidence as PASS.

Fresh review result: do not approve this closeout or classify AF-01 as CLOSED_CANONICAL yet. The supplied material does not provide qualification evidence for exact head 57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1.

Finding 1 — No exact closeout-head identity or workflow evidence

Severity: High

closeout.md requires the exact closeout head/tree and successful terminal workflows (lines 220–226), but records neither the 57f7dd… tree/file identity nor any run, check-run, artifact, or digest for that head. All listed workflow evidence is for the earlier convergence head ae8967a… (lines 23–78), and the post-merge evidence is for merge commit 652207a… (lines 100–157). Those do not qualify the new closeout head.

This is especially material because ci.yml, af01-assurance-proof.yml, and af01-scorecard.yml all have unfiltered pull_request triggers (ci.yml:3–5, af01-assurance-proof.yml:3–8, af01-scorecard.yml:3–10), so exact-head terminal results for this candidate are expected rather than safely inferable.

Finding 2 — T054/T055 provenance is being reused across a head mutation

Severity: High

The task rules explicitly state that any head mutation invalidates prior exact-head qualification unless content-independence is proven (tasks.md:7–9). The candidate head is 57f7dd…, while T054/T055 evidence is bound to ae8967a…, PR #51, and merge 652207a… (closeout.md:25, 102–120). The closeout does not show that 57f7dd… is the exact qualified convergence head, nor does it provide a content-independent qualification accepted for this new head.

The historical T054/T055 claims may remain valid for the convergence PR, but they cannot serve as exact-head qualification for T056.

Finding 3 — No fresh review truth or thread disposition for the closeout head

Severity: High

The only cited reviewer evidence is Qodo and CodeRabbit activity from PR #51 (closeout.md:87–92). T056 explicitly requires fresh Qodo/CodeRabbit truth when available and disposition of every substantive returned finding (closeout.md:221–225), but there is no review result tied to 57f7dd…, no finding list, and no evidence that the closeout-head review threads are resolved.

Finding 4 — Live-ruleset claims are not freshly bound to this closeout

Severity: Medium

The ruleset section says the read-back occurred “after the convergence merge” (closeout.md:161–200), not after qualification of exact closeout head 57f7dd…. T056 requires canonical post-merge main and live rulesets to be re-read as part of this closeout gate (closeout.md:224–226). No timestamp, API snapshot, commit relation, or new read-back is supplied for this candidate. The prior ruleset evidence should be retained as historical T055 evidence, not treated as current closeout evidence.

Finding 5 — Semantic-freeze evidence is not bound to the exact closeout tree

Severity: Medium

The provided diff shows only documentation/task-state changes, and no product-source mutation is visible. However, the recorded semantic proof is anchored to the earlier Stack C/convergence range (convergence.md:253–283), while the closeout claim at closeout.md:208–214 is not accompanied by an exact 57f7dd… tree comparison or clean-source artifact. Therefore the absence of a semantic change is plausible from the displayed diff, but not independently proven for the requested exact head.

T056 / false-closure assessment

The current files correctly keep Status: CLOSEOUT_CANDIDATE and leave T056 unchecked (tasks.md:3, 91–93), so I found no present explicit AF-01=CLOSED_CANONICAL claim. That guard reduces false-closure risk, but the candidate must remain open until exact-head CI/workflow evidence, fresh review/disposition evidence, and fresh post-merge canonical/ruleset read-back are recorded. The historical T054/T055 evidence should not be promoted into T056 completion without those missing bindings.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

AF-01 T056 closeout exact-head qualification checkpoint

This checkpoint records temporal qualification for the unchanged closeout candidate without creating a circular commit mutation.

head: 57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1
tree: a36b789feadfc22e6293da42567bfecdc3ef9faa
base main: 652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028
changed paths: exactly 2
  A specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md
  M specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/tasks.md

Exact-head workflows

All five path-applicable pull-request workflows are terminal and successful on this exact head:

ci:                    33082005707 — completed/success
cf06-oracle:           33082005662 — completed/success
af01-security:         33082005671 — completed/success
af01-scorecard:        33082005660 — completed/success
af01-assurance-proof:  33082005667 — completed/success

Required-context uniqueness and provenance

rust
  check-run/job: 98551447875
  count: 1
  head_sha: 57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1
  status: completed
  conclusion: success
  GitHub Actions integration: 15368

assurance-proof
  check-run/job: 98551447459
  count: 1
  head_sha: 57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1
  status: completed
  conclusion: success
  GitHub Actions integration: 15368

scorecard
  check-run/job: 98551447776
  count: 1
  head_sha: 57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1
  status: completed
  conclusion: success
  GitHub Actions integration: 15368

Exact-head retained artifacts

af01-assurance-proof
  run: 33082005667
  artifact: 9650583820
  GitHub digest: sha256:1c771b840b895b158366d2b664af5f87d2ca8f053b292a1a3ef826d7bfef0288
  AF01_ASSURANCE_SHA256: 0f943e3fbd9d55b09f302b2a620f739308e7f83cecf859f610ecdcc06659e823
  assurance-summary.json sha256: 0f943e3fbd9d55b09f302b2a620f739308e7f83cecf859f610ecdcc06659e823
  source.sha: 57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1
  source.tree: a36b789feadfc22e6293da42567bfecdc3ef9faa
  source status: clean

af01-scorecard
  run: 33082005660
  artifact: 9650479860
  GitHub digest: sha256:a19292406f9d9b001bdb3c7f83bceba02d273f13cd14660b3a28684548dd27a7
  source SHA: 57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1

Fresh live policy read-back

Immediately after exact-head qualification and while canonical main remains 652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028:

ruleset 21652953 — commandF main assurance
  enforcement: active
  applies: refs/heads/main
  bypass actors: none
  current user bypass: never
  deletion: blocked
  non_fast_forward: blocked
  strict checks:
    rust / integration 15368
    assurance-proof / integration 15368
    scorecard / integration 15368

ruleset 21652974 — commandF main review governance
  enforcement: active
  applies: refs/heads/main
  merge method: merge only
  approvals: 1
  code-owner review: required
  latest-push approval: required
  stale approvals dismissed: true
  review-thread resolution: required
  bypass: RepositoryRole actor 5 / pull_request only

The review-only bypass cannot bypass the separate assurance ruleset, which has no bypass actor.

Exact closeout semantic-freeze proof

Authoritative base-to-head compare is two commits ahead, zero behind, and changes only the two AF-01 documentation/task-state paths listed above. No Rust source, workflow, Cargo manifest, Cargo.lock, ruleset intent, security policy, oracle identity, or frozen corpus changed. The exact-head assurance artifact independently binds the same head/tree and records clean source status.

Qodo finding disposition

Qodo comment 5440558746 was produced before these exact-head workflows had completed. Its findings are addressed as follows without a head mutation:

  1. Exact closeout-head identity/workflow evidence — now supplied above: exact SHA/tree, five terminal successful runs, check-run identities, artifacts, digests, and clean-source binding.
  2. T054/T055 provenance reuse — historical T054/T055 evidence is not being reused as T056 exact-head qualification. Those tasks remain historical completed prerequisites; this checkpoint is the separate exact 57f7dd... T056 candidate qualification required by closeout.md and tasks.md.
  3. Fresh review/thread truth — Qodo's own exact-head review is now part of PR docs(af01): close trusted development baseline #52 truth; CodeRabbit fresh exact-head review is being retried after its documented rate limit. GitHub currently reports zero inline review threads and therefore zero unresolved substantive review threads.
  4. Fresh live ruleset binding — both live rulesets were re-read again after exact-head qualification, as recorded above.
  5. Exact closeout semantic freeze — exact base/head changed-path comparison plus exact-head clean-source assurance artifact are now supplied above.

Gate state

T054: COMPLETE (historical convergence prerequisite)
T055: COMPLETE (historical canonical convergence merge/post-merge prerequisite)
T056: STILL OPEN
AF-01: NOT YET CLOSED_CANONICAL

T056 remains open until Qodo re-evaluates these now-available exact-head facts, CodeRabbit supplies fresh exact-head truth, zero substantive review findings remain, and this unchanged head is merged with an exact expected-head guard followed by post-merge canonical/live-policy verification.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@qodo review

Please re-evaluate unchanged exact head 57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1 using qualification checkpoint 5440624578. The five workflows, required-context uniqueness, exact-head artifacts/source-tree binding, clean source status, fresh live ruleset read-back, exact semantic-freeze compare, and finding-by-finding dispositions are now available without a head mutation. Report any remaining substantive issue; T056 remains open pending your disposition and CodeRabbit truth.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@coderabbitai full review

Retry after the prior review-limit cooldown. Please perform the fresh review of unchanged exact head 57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1 using qualification checkpoint 5440624578. Focus on evidence correctness, T056 sequencing, live-policy binding, semantic freeze, task-state truth, and false-CLOSED_CANONICAL risk. Report any remaining substantive issue.

@qodo-code-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

review

Please re-evaluate unchanged exact head 57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1 using qualification checkpoint 5440624578. The five workflows, required-context uniqueness, exact-head artifacts/source-tree binding, clean source status, fresh live ruleset read-back, exact semantic-freeze compare, and finding-by-finding dispositions are now available without a head mutation. Report any remaining substantive issue; T056 remains open pending your disposition and CodeRabbit truth.

I find one remaining substantive auditability issue: the checked-in closeout evidence still identifies the prior exact head ae8967a933832c4331d895f6389a9e086c23e661 and checkpoint 5440100797 (specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md:23-31), not the requested unchanged head 57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1 and qualification checkpoint 5440624578.

  • The diff is documentation/task-state only; I found no product-semantic issue.
  • The supplied qualification claims are sufficient in principle, and I find no additional substantive defect from the code change itself.
  • Before T056 can close, update the retained closeout evidence to bind the current head/checkpoint and attach the fresh CodeRabbit result, then preserve the exact-head/no-substitution merge condition.

Therefore, my disposition is: no product issue; T056 remains open for evidence synchronization and CodeRabbit truth.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@coderabbitai

Please provide an exact-head disposition for unchanged 57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1 using checkpoint 5440624578. Independently verify the five successful workflows, unique required contexts with app 15368, exact-head assurance/Scorecard artifacts, assurance source SHA/tree and clean-source binding, two-path docs-only compare, fresh live rulesets, and zero review threads. State explicitly whether any substantive issue, false-PASS risk, or false-CLOSED_CANONICAL risk remains. T056 is still open.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

expected_head='57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1'
base='652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028'

echo '== local commit identity and changed paths =='
git rev-parse HEAD
git show -s --format='commit=%H%ntree=%T%nparents=%P%nsubject=%s' "$expected_head"
git diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-status -r "$expected_head"
echo '-- base to head --'
git diff --name-status "$base" "$expected_head"
git diff --stat "$base" "$expected_head"
git rev-list --left-right --count "$base...$expected_head"

echo '== modified document maps =='
ast-grep outline specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md --items all 2>/dev/null || true
ast-grep outline specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/tasks.md --items all 2>/dev/null || true

echo '== modified document contents =='
cat -n specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md
cat -n specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/tasks.md

echo '== referenced AF-01 documentation =='
fd -t f . specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline -x sh -c \
  'case "$1" in *closeout.md|*tasks.md) ;; *) printf "\n--- %s ---\n" "$1"; rg -n -i -C2 "T054|T055|T056|CLOSED_CANONICAL|assurance|ruleset|scorecard" "$1" || true;; esac' sh {}

Length of output: 66012


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo='TheHalfMoon/commandF'
pr='52'
head='57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1'

echo '== pull request and commits =='
gh pr view "$pr" --repo "$repo" --json number,state,headRefOid,baseRefOid,mergeCommit,commits,changedFiles,files,reviews \
  --jq '{number,state,headRefOid,baseRefOid,mergeCommit,changedFiles,files:[.files[]|{path,additions,deletions}],reviews:[.reviews[]|{author:.author.login,state,commit:.commit.oid,submittedAt}]}'

echo '== exact-head check runs =='
gh api "repos/$repo/commits/$head/check-runs?per_page=100" --paginate \
  --jq '.check_runs[] | {id,name,head_sha,status,conclusion,app:{id:.app.id,slug:.app.slug,name:.app.name},details_url}'

echo '== named workflow runs =='
for run in 33082005707 33082005662 33082005671 33082005660 33082005667; do
  gh api "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run" \
    --jq '{id,name,event,status,conclusion,head_sha,head_branch,workflow_id,run_started_at,updated_at}'
done

echo '== artifacts =='
for run in 33082005667 33082005660; do
  gh api "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run/artifacts?per_page=100" \
    --jq '.artifacts[] | {id,name,size_in_bytes,expired,created_at,updated_at,digest}'
done

echo '== active repository rulesets =='
gh api "repos/$repo/rulesets?includes_parents=true" \
  --jq '.[] | select(.id == 21652953 or .id == 21652974) | {id,name,target,enforcement,conditions,rules,bypass_actors}'

echo '== PR reviews and issue comments =='
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/$pr/reviews?per_page=100" --paginate \
  --jq '.[] | {id,user:.user.login,state,commit_id,submitted_at,body}'
gh api "repos/$repo/issues/$pr/comments?per_page=100" --paginate \
  --jq '.[] | select(.user.login == "qodo-merge-pro" or .user.login == "coderabbitai" or (.body|test("5440624578|5440558746"))) | {id,user:.user.login,created_at,body}'

Length of output: 16676


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo='TheHalfMoon/commandF'
head='57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1'
base='652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028'

echo '== current canonical branch =='
gh api "repos/$repo/branches/main" --jq '{name,protected,commit:{sha:.commit.sha}}'
gh api "repos/$repo/compare/$base...$head" \
  --jq '{status,ahead_by,behind_by,total_commits,files:[.files[]|{status,filename}]}'

echo '== detailed rulesets =='
for id in 21652953 21652974; do
  gh api "repos/$repo/rulesets/$id" \
    --jq '{id,name,target,enforcement,conditions,bypass_actors,rules}'
done

echo '== review threads and review comments =='
gh api graphql -F owner='TheHalfMoon' -F name='commandF' -F number=52 -f query='
query($owner:String!, $name:String!, $number:Int!) {
  repository(owner:$owner, name:$name) {
    pullRequest(number:$number) {
      reviewThreads(first:100) {
        nodes {
          isResolved
          isOutdated
          comments(first:20) {
            nodes { author { login } body path line originalLine createdAt }
          }
        }
      }
      reviews(first:100) {
        nodes { author { login } state commit { oid } submittedAt body }
      }
    }
  }
}' --jq '.data.repository.pullRequest'

echo '== historical T054/T055 GitHub evidence =='
gh pr view 51 --repo "$repo" --json state,mergedAt,mergeCommit,headRefOid,baseRefOid \
  --jq '{state,mergedAt,headRefOid,baseRefOid,mergeCommit}'
for run in 33078356963 33078357039 33078357105 33078357068 33078356986 33079909197 33079909183; do
  gh api "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run" \
    --jq '{id,name,event,status,conclusion,head_sha,run_started_at}'
done
for run in 33078356986 33078357068 33079909197 33079909183; do
  gh api "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run/artifacts?per_page=100" \
    --jq '.artifacts[] | {id,name,digest,expired}'
done
gh api "repos/$repo/issues/51/comments?per_page=100" --paginate \
  --jq '.[] | select(.id == 5440100797 or .id == 5440158934 or .id == 5440191060) | {id,user:.user.login,created_at,body}'

Length of output: 21301


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo='TheHalfMoon/commandF'
tmp="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmp"' EXIT

fetch_and_inspect() {
  local artifact_id="$1"
  local label="$2"
  echo "== $label artifact $artifact_id =="

  gh api -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' \
    "repos/$repo/actions/artifacts/$artifact_id/zip" > "$tmp/$artifact_id.zip"
  unzip -l "$tmp/$artifact_id.zip"
  unzip -qq "$tmp/$artifact_id.zip" -d "$tmp/$artifact_id"
  find "$tmp/$artifact_id" -type f -print -exec sha256sum {} \;
  find "$tmp/$artifact_id" -type f \( -name 'assurance-summary.json' -o -name 'source.sha' -o -name 'source.tree' \) \
    -exec sh -c 'echo "--- $1"; cat "$1"' sh {} \;
}

fetch_and_inspect 9650583820 'T056 assurance'
fetch_and_inspect 9649667139 'T055 post-merge assurance'

Length of output: 15866


@TheHalfMoon Fresh review completed for exact head 57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1.

I found one substantive issue.

  • specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md Line 195 states that the live review-governance ruleset has RepositoryRole actor 5 with pull_request bypass mode. The detailed GitHub response for ruleset 21652974 reports bypass_actors: null. The response confirms the main target and all stated pull-request controls, but it does not support the claimed bypass actor or bypass mode. Since this section is presented as a live policy read-back, correct the record to match the live ruleset or apply and then re-read the intended bypass configuration. A replacement commit requires fresh exact-head qualification before T056 can proceed.

I verified the remaining evidence:

  • The exact head and tree match the checkpoint.
  • The base-to-head comparison is two commits ahead, zero behind, and changes only the two stated AF-01 documentation paths.
  • All five path-applicable workflows succeeded on the exact head.
  • rust, assurance-proof, and scorecard each have one successful GitHub Actions check run with integration ID 15368.
  • The exact-head assurance artifact binds the requested source SHA/tree. Its summary digest matches AF01_ASSURANCE_SHA256.
  • The T054 and T055 workflow, artifact, and merge evidence matches the retained record.
  • GitHub reports zero review threads on #52.
  • T056 remains open. The documents do not make a false AF-01=CLOSED_CANONICAL claim.

The Qodo request to write T056 checkpoint data into closeout.md is not necessary. That action would change the exact qualified head. The GitHub checkpoint is the correct non-circular record for temporal T056 evidence.

You are interacting with an AI system.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@coderabbitai

Please correct the sole finding against the authoritative detailed ruleset endpoint. A fresh direct GET of repos/TheHalfMoon/commandF/rulesets/21652974 after your review returns:

"bypass_actors": [
  {
    "actor_id": 5,
    "actor_type": "RepositoryRole",
    "bypass_mode": "pull_request"
  }
],
"current_user_can_bypass": "pull_requests_only"

The same detailed response confirms enforcement: active, refs/heads/main, merge-only, one approval, code-owner review, latest-push approval, stale-review dismissal, and review-thread resolution. Therefore closeout.md matches live GitHub truth; no replacement commit is warranted. Please re-evaluate exact unchanged head 57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1 and state whether any substantive issue remains.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo="TheHalfMoon/commandF"
pr=52
head="57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1"

echo "== PR identity, merge state, and changed files =="
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/$pr" \
  --jq '{number, state, merged, merge_commit_sha, base: .base.sha, head: .head.sha, head_ref: .head.ref}'
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/pulls/$pr/files?per_page=100" \
  --jq '.[] | {filename,status,sha,additions,deletions}'

echo "== Commit tree and compare =="
gh api "repos/$repo/git/commits/$head" --jq '{sha,tree: .tree.sha,parents: [.parents[].sha]}'
base="$(gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/$pr" --jq '.base.sha')"
gh api "repos/$repo/compare/$base...$head" \
  --jq '{status,ahead_by,behind_by,total_commits,files: [.files[] | {filename,status,additions,deletions}]}'

echo "== Pull-request workflow runs at exact head =="
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/actions/runs?event=pull_request&head_sha=$head&per_page=100" \
  --jq '.workflow_runs[] | {id,name,event,status,conclusion,head_sha,head_branch,run_attempt}'

echo "== Required check contexts at exact head =="
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/commits/$head/check-runs?per_page=100" \
  --jq '.check_runs[] | select(.name == "rust" or .name == "assurance-proof" or .name == "scorecard") | {id,name,status,conclusion,head_sha,app: {id: .app.id,slug: .app.slug},details_url}'

echo "== Artifacts for stated workflow runs =="
for run in 33082005667 33082005660; do
  echo "-- run $run --"
  gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run/artifacts?per_page=100" \
    --jq '.artifacts[] | {id,name,size_in_bytes,expired,created_at,updated_at,digest}'
done

echo "== Active repository rulesets =="
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/rulesets?includes_parents=true&per_page=100" \
  --jq '.[] | select(.id == 21652953 or .id == 21652974) | {id,name,target,enforcement,conditions,rules,bypass_actors}'

echo "== Reviews, review comments, and unresolved review threads =="
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/pulls/$pr/reviews?per_page=100" \
  --jq '.[] | {id,user: .user.login,state,commit_id,submitted_at}'
gh api graphql -F owner="TheHalfMoon" -F name="commandF" -F number="$pr" -f query='
query($owner:String!, $name:String!, $number:Int!) {
  repository(owner:$owner,name:$name) {
    pullRequest(number:$number) {
      reviewThreads(first:100) {
        totalCount
        nodes { isResolved isOutdated comments(first:10) { nodes { author { login } body commit { oid } } } }
      }
    }
  }
}' \
  --jq '.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads | {totalCount, threads: [.nodes[] | {isResolved,isOutdated,comments: [.comments.nodes[] | {author: .author.login,commit: .commit.oid,body}]}]}'

echo "== Local exact-head files =="
git rev-parse HEAD
git status --short
git diff --name-status "$base...$head"
for path in \
  "specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md" \
  "specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/tasks.md"; do
  echo "-- $path --"
  git show "$head:$path" | nl -ba
done

Length of output: 7852


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo="TheHalfMoon/commandF"
pr=52
head="57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1"
tmp="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmp"' EXIT

echo "== Exact-head assurance artifact content and digest validation =="
gh api -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
  "repos/$repo/actions/artifacts/9650583820/zip" > "$tmp/assurance.zip"
sha256sum "$tmp/assurance.zip"
unzip -l "$tmp/assurance.zip"
unzip -p "$tmp/assurance.zip" | strings | grep -E -C 3 \
  'AF01_ASSURANCE_SHA256|assurance-summary\.json|source(\.sha| SHA|\.tree| tree| status)|57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1|a36b789feadfc22e6293da42567bfecdc3ef9faa|clean' \
  || true
echo "-- individually hashed artifact entries --"
unzip -Z1 "$tmp/assurance.zip" | while IFS= read -r entry; do
  printf '%s  %s\n' "$(unzip -p "$tmp/assurance.zip" "$entry" | sha256sum | awk '{print $1}')" "$entry"
done

echo "== Exact-head Scorecard artifact content =="
gh api -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
  "repos/$repo/actions/artifacts/9650479860/zip" > "$tmp/scorecard.zip"
sha256sum "$tmp/scorecard.zip"
unzip -l "$tmp/scorecard.zip"
unzip -p "$tmp/scorecard.zip" | strings | grep -E -C 3 \
  '57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1|source|SHA|scorecard' \
  || true

echo "== Full active ruleset definitions =="
for ruleset in 21652953 21652974; do
  echo "-- ruleset $ruleset --"
  gh api "repos/$repo/rulesets/$ruleset" \
    --jq '{id,name,target,enforcement,source_type,source,conditions,rules,bypass_actors}'
done

echo "== Changed exact-head documents =="
for path in \
  "specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md" \
  "specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/tasks.md"; do
  echo "-- $path --"
  git show "$head:$path" | sed -n '1,320p'
done

echo "== Exact-head review automation evidence in PR timeline =="
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/issues/$pr/comments?per_page=100" \
  --jq '.[] | select((.user.login | test("qodo|coderabbit"; "i")) or (.body | test("qodo|coderabbit|5440624578|57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1"; "i"))) | {id,user: .user.login,created_at,body}'
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/pulls/$pr/comments?per_page=100" \
  --jq '.[] | select((.user.login | test("qodo|coderabbit"; "i")) or (.body | test("qodo|coderabbit|57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1"; "i"))) | {id,user: .user.login,commit_id,path,created_at,body}'

Length of output: 62413


@TheHalfMoon

Disposition: one substantive issue remains. Do not complete T056 or classify AF-01 as CLOSED_CANONICAL.

I independently verified these exact-head facts for 57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1:

  • The head tree is a36b789feadfc22e6293da42567bfecdc3ef9faa.
  • The base is 652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028.
  • The compare is two commits ahead and zero commits behind.
  • The compare changes exactly:
    • specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md
    • specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/tasks.md
  • The five named pull-request workflows completed successfully on the exact head.
  • rust, assurance-proof, and scorecard each have one successful check run from GitHub Actions app 15368.
  • Assurance artifact 9650583820 and Scorecard artifact 9650479860 exist and are not expired.
  • The downloaded assurance archive matches GitHub digest sha256:1c771b...ef0288.
  • assurance-summary.json hashes to 0f943e3f...659e823, which matches AF01_ASSURANCE_SHA256.
  • The retained assurance evidence binds the requested source SHA and tree and records clean source status.
  • GitHub reports zero review threads on #52.
  • Fresh Qodo and CodeRabbit exact-head results exist.

The remaining issue is in specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md Line 195. The document states that live review-governance ruleset 21652974 has a RepositoryRole actor 5 bypass in pull_request mode. The detailed GitHub ruleset response reports:

bypass_actors: null

The response supports the main scope and the stated pull-request controls. It does not support the claimed bypass actor or bypass mode.

This is a substantive live-policy evidence error. It creates a false-PASS risk if the record is used as proof of the exact live policy. Correct the record to match the live ruleset, or configure the intended bypass and re-read the ruleset. Either change creates a new head and requires new exact-head qualification.

There is no current false-CLOSED_CANONICAL claim. The documents keep Status: CLOSEOUT_CANDIDATE and leave T056 open. However, the live-policy discrepancy means T056 must remain open.

You are interacting with an AI system.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo='TheHalfMoon/commandF'
head='57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1'
ruleset_id='21652974'

echo '== exact commit identity =='
git show -s --format='commit=%H%ntree=%T%nparents=%P' "$head"

echo '== closeout bypass claim at exact head =='
git show "$head:specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md" |
  nl -ba |
  sed -n '185,205p'

echo '== detailed review-governance ruleset =='
gh api "repos/$repo/rulesets/$ruleset_id" \
  --jq '{
    id,
    name,
    enforcement,
    target,
    conditions,
    bypass_actors,
    current_user_can_bypass,
    rules: [
      .rules[]
      | select(
          .type == "pull_request"
          or .type == "deletion"
          or .type == "non_fast_forward"
        )
    ]
  }'

echo '== exact-head changed paths =='
git diff --name-status 652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028 "$head"

Length of output: 1441


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo='TheHalfMoon/commandF'
head='57f7dd45481024d12993dd2abd1dd130cb0ec0d1'
base='652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028'
ruleset_id='21652974'

echo '== closeout bypass claim at exact head =='
git show "$head:specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md" |
  awk 'NR >= 185 && NR <= 205 { printf "%6d  %s\n", NR, $0 }'

echo '== detailed review-governance ruleset =='
gh api "repos/$repo/rulesets/$ruleset_id" \
  --jq '{
    id,
    name,
    enforcement,
    target,
    conditions,
    bypass_actors,
    current_user_can_bypass,
    rules: [
      .rules[]
      | select(
          .type == "pull_request"
          or .type == "deletion"
          or .type == "non_fast_forward"
        )
    ]
  }'

echo '== exact-head changed paths =='
git diff --name-status "$base" "$head"

Length of output: 2414


@TheHalfMoon The substantive issue remains.

The fresh successful GET repos/TheHalfMoon/commandF/rulesets/21652974 returned:

"bypass_actors": null,
"current_user_can_bypass": "never"

This result conflicts with closeout.md Lines 195-197, which records:

RepositoryRole actor 5
mode: pull_request only

The endpoint does confirm the other recorded review-governance controls. It confirms active enforcement, refs/heads/main, merge-only, one approval, code-owner review, latest-push approval, stale-review dismissal, and review-thread resolution.

I cannot treat the user-provided JSON as verified because the direct API response from this review returns different values. Therefore, the live-policy read-back remains inaccurate under the available authoritative evidence.

No false AF-01=CLOSED_CANONICAL claim appears in the exact head. The two-path documentation-only comparison also remains correct. However, the live-ruleset discrepancy is a substantive issue. T056 must remain open until the closeout record and the detailed endpoint agree.

You are interacting with an AI system.

@greptile-apps greptile-apps Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your trial has ended. Reactivate Greptile to resume code reviews.

TheHalfMoon commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

AF-01 T056 exact-head qualification checkpoint — current head

This checkpoint supersedes the prior-head T056 checkpoint. It records temporal qualification for the unchanged current closeout head without creating a circular commit mutation.

head: 65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e
tree: a7cac5a52d7a6b2b4d89b17018d084c835de312c
base main: 652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028
changed repository paths: exactly 2
  specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md
  specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/tasks.md

The diff remains documentation/task-state only. It changes no Rust source, workflow, Cargo manifest, Cargo.lock, dependency policy, ruleset intent, oracle identity, frozen corpus, or runtime behavior.

Exact-head workflows

All five path-applicable pull-request workflows are terminal and successful on this exact head:

ci:                    33083016573 — completed/success
cf06-oracle:           33083016577 — completed/success
af01-security:         33083016641 — completed/success
af01-scorecard:        33083016588 — completed/success
af01-assurance-proof:  33083016604 — completed/success

Required-context uniqueness and provenance

rust
  check-run/job: 98555034268
  count: 1
  head_sha: 65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e
  status: completed
  conclusion: success
  GitHub Actions integration: 15368

assurance-proof
  check-run/job: 98555034236
  count: 1
  head_sha: 65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e
  status: completed
  conclusion: success
  GitHub Actions integration: 15368

scorecard
  check-run/job: 98555034042
  count: 1
  head_sha: 65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e
  status: completed
  conclusion: success
  GitHub Actions integration: 15368

Exact-head retained assurance evidence

af01-assurance-proof
  run: 33083016604
  artifact: 9651015794
  GitHub digest: sha256:85633483a929f753c9d322e48165081199f27cb6152c829f8e81852c3b4e460d
  AF01_ASSURANCE_SHA256: 08f939ed16ff5fc18313c3cc1393d3a6cbfb51438f66e7ab59e9d45356b5b731
  assurance-summary.json sha256: 08f939ed16ff5fc18313c3cc1393d3a6cbfb51438f66e7ab59e9d45356b5b731
  source.sha: 65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e
  source.tree: a7cac5a52d7a6b2b4d89b17018d084c835de312c
  source status: clean

The assurance artifact is the exact-head source-binding authority for this T056 candidate.

Scorecard posture evidence — scoped correctly

af01-scorecard workflow/check
  run: 33083016588
  check-run/job: 98555034042
  workflow head_sha: 65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e
  result: completed/success
  artifact: 9650896516
  GitHub digest: sha256:0642930b57fe56cc2935e2e5359462b0cadc9f61830aebf73ee605909e524af2

The retained artifact contains two different Scorecard scopes and must not be over-interpreted:

  • af01-scorecard-local.json is produced from the checked-out local source but reports repo.name=file://. and repo.commit=unknown.
  • af01-scorecard-repository.json is repository-level GitHub posture evidence and explicitly records repo.commit=652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028, the canonical base main commit, not the PR head.

Therefore the Scorecard artifact is supplemental posture evidence, not an exact-head source-binding artifact. Its exact-head workflow/check provenance proves the universally terminal scorecard context ran successfully for this PR; exact candidate source/tree binding is established separately by the assurance artifact above. No claim is made that the repository-level Scorecard payload internally scans commit 65d44c....

Fresh owner-authorized live policy read-back

Ruleset 21652953 (commandF main assurance) remains active on refs/heads/main, with no bypass actors, current_user_can_bypass=never, deletion/non-fast-forward protection, and strict integration-bound required contexts rust, assurance-proof, and scorecard, each bound to GitHub Actions app 15368.

Ruleset 21652974 (commandF main review governance) remains active on refs/heads/main; the owner-authorized detailed endpoint returns the reviewed PR controls and:

bypass_actors:
  actor_id: 5
  actor_type: RepositoryRole
  bypass_mode: pull_request
current_user_can_bypass: pull_requests_only

The checked-in closeout explicitly records that owner-authorized ruleset read-back is authoritative for repository-administration fields and that narrower reviewer-app credentials can receive redacted/null bypass fields. The PR-only review bypass cannot bypass the separate assurance ruleset, which has no bypass actor.

Temporal-evidence rule

The checked-in closeout explicitly defines the non-circular evidence model: workflow/check/artifact/reviewer identifiers created after a commit exists are retained in this PR checkpoint rather than committed back into the same candidate, because doing so would create a new SHA and immediately invalidate the evidence.

Review truth

Qodo current-head comment 5440762043 reviewed exact 65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e and found no remaining substantive issue. CodeRabbit current-head comment 5440777043 independently verified the exact-head workflow/check/assurance evidence and found one checkpoint wording issue: the earlier checkpoint incorrectly described the Scorecard artifact as though its repository-level payload bound to the PR head. That overstatement is corrected above without a repository head mutation.

Gate state

T054: COMPLETE
T055: COMPLETE
T056: STILL OPEN
AF-01: NOT YET CLOSED_CANONICAL

T056 remains open until CodeRabbit re-evaluates this corrected checkpoint on the unchanged exact head, no unresolved substantive findings remain, review threads are zero, and this exact head is merged with an expected-head guard followed by post-merge canonical/live-policy verification.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@qodo review

Please perform a fresh review of unchanged exact head 65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e using current qualification checkpoint 5440752132. Focus on evidence correctness, non-circular temporal-evidence sequencing, the owner-authorized vs permission-redacted reviewer-app ruleset visibility explanation, T054/T055 provenance, exact two-path semantic freeze, task-state truth, and false-CLOSED_CANONICAL risk. Report any remaining substantive issue. T056 remains open.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@coderabbitai

Please perform a fresh exact-head review of unchanged 65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e using checkpoint 5440752132. Verify the five successful workflows, unique integration-bound required contexts, exact-head assurance/Scorecard artifacts and source binding, docs-only two-path diff, T054/T055 history, and the updated evidence-authority wording. In particular, evaluate whether the document now correctly distinguishes owner-authorized ruleset administration fields from permission-redacted reviewer-app visibility rather than treating a redacted/null field as authoritative absence. State explicitly whether any substantive issue, false-PASS risk, or false-CLOSED_CANONICAL risk remains. T056 remains open.

@qodo-code-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

review

Please perform a fresh review of unchanged exact head 65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e using current qualification checkpoint 5440752132. Focus on evidence correctness, non-circular temporal-evidence sequencing, the owner-authorized vs permission-redacted reviewer-app ruleset visibility explanation, T054/T055 provenance, exact two-path semantic freeze, task-state truth, and false-CLOSED_CANONICAL risk. Report any remaining substantive issue. T056 remains open.

Fresh review of exact head 65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e against checkpoint 5440752132 found no remaining substantive issue.

  • Evidence correctness/provenance: The closeout separates retained prerequisite evidence from temporal T056 evidence. The convergence and post-merge identities are internally consistent, including the exact head/tree relationships and artifact source bindings.
  • Non-circular sequencing: closeout.md:7-9 and :219-233 correctly keep workflow, reviewer, artifact, and post-merge identifiers in the immutable qualification checkpoint rather than rewriting the candidate and invalidating its SHA.
  • Ruleset visibility: closeout.md:163-165 appropriately distinguishes owner-authorized detailed ruleset read-back from permission-scoped App responses that may redact or return null for bypass_actors; the assurance-layer and review-layer bypass boundaries remain clearly separated.
  • T054/T055: The recorded exact-head workflow/check-run/artifact evidence and the expected-head merge/post-merge evidence are adequately tied to their respective SHAs. The required-check topology and PR-vs-push applicability are also documented in convergence.md:117-127 and :228-239.
  • Semantic freeze: The two-path proof is present: the repository compare shows no Rust-source changes, while the reviewed manifest identity tightening and workflow-wrapper changes are separately explained and qualified (convergence.md:253-283).
  • Task-state/false closure: tasks.md:3, :80-93 and closeout.md:233-239 correctly retain CLOSEOUT_CANDIDATE, leave T056 unchecked, and prohibit AF-01=CLOSED_CANONICAL until this exact candidate qualifies and merges unchanged.

Disposition: T056 remains open as requested. No false-CLOSED_CANONICAL claim or substantive review finding remains evident.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@coderabbitai review

Incremental exact-head review of current 65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e; use checkpoint 5440752132. The only post-prior-head code change is documentation clarifying non-circular temporal evidence and owner-authorized vs permission-redacted ruleset visibility. Please state any remaining substantive finding or false-closure risk.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo='TheHalfMoon/commandF'
pr='52'
head='65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e'
base='652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028'

echo '== exact head, tree, and changed paths =='
git show -s --format='commit=%H%ntree=%T%nparents=%P%nsubject=%s' "$head"
git diff --name-status "$base" "$head"
git diff --stat "$base" "$head"
git rev-list --left-right --count "$base...$head"

echo '== changed documents at exact head =='
for path in \
  specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md \
  specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/tasks.md
do
  echo "--- $path ---"
  git show "$head:$path" | nl -ba
done

echo '== relevant AF-01 historical documentation =='
fd -t f . specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline -x sh -c \
  'case "$1" in
     *closeout.md|*tasks.md) ;;
     *) echo "--- $1 ---"; rg -n -i -C2 "T054|T055|T056|CLOSED_CANONICAL|33079909197|33079909183|652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028" "$1" || true ;;
   esac' sh {}

echo '== PR identity and exact-head workflows =='
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/$pr" \
  --jq '{number,state,merged,base:.base.sha,head:.head.sha,changed_files}'
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/actions/runs?event=pull_request&head_sha=$head&per_page=100" \
  --jq '.workflow_runs[] | {id,name,event,status,conclusion,head_sha,run_attempt}'

echo '== required contexts at exact head =='
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/commits/$head/check-runs?per_page=100" \
  --jq '[.check_runs[] | select(.name == "rust" or .name == "assurance-proof" or .name == "scorecard") | {id,name,head_sha,status,conclusion,app_id:.app.id,app_slug:.app.slug}]'

echo '== stated artifacts =='
for run in 33083016604 33083016588; do
  echo "--- run=$run ---"
  gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run/artifacts?per_page=100" \
    --jq '.artifacts[] | {id,name,expired,digest,size_in_bytes}'
done

echo '== detailed active rulesets =='
for ruleset in 21652953 21652974; do
  echo "--- ruleset=$ruleset ---"
  gh api "repos/$repo/rulesets/$ruleset" \
    --jq '{id,name,enforcement,target,conditions,bypass_actors,current_user_can_bypass,rules}'
done

echo '== review threads and reviews =='
gh api graphql -F owner='TheHalfMoon' -F name='commandF' -F number=52 -f query='
query($owner:String!, $name:String!, $number:Int!) {
  repository(owner:$owner,name:$name) {
    pullRequest(number:$number) {
      reviewThreads(first:100) {
        totalCount
        nodes {
          isResolved
          isOutdated
          comments(first:10) { nodes { author { login } body commit { oid } } }
        }
      }
      reviews(first:100) { nodes { author { login } state commit { oid } submittedAt } }
    }
  }
}' --jq '.data.repository.pullRequest'

echo '== T054/T055 PR and stated workflow history =='
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/51" \
  --jq '{number,state,merged,merged_at,base:.base.sha,head:.head.sha,merge_commit_sha}'
for run in 33078356963 33078357039 33078357105 33078357068 33078356986 33079909197 33079909183; do
  gh api "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run" \
    --jq '{id,name,event,status,conclusion,head_sha}'
done

Length of output: 4105


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -u

repo='TheHalfMoon/commandF'
pr='52'
head='65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e'
base='652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028'

echo '== exact head and base comparison =='
git show -s --format='commit=%H%ntree=%T%nparents=%P%nsubject=%s' "$head"
git diff --name-status "$base" "$head"
git rev-list --left-right --count "$base...$head"

echo '== relevant exact-head document excerpts =='
for path in \
  specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md \
  specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/tasks.md
do
  echo "--- $path ---"
  git show "$head:$path" | awk '
    /T054|T055|T056|CLOSED_CANONICAL|owner-authorized|redacted|null|bypass_actors|current_user_can_bypass|temporal-evidence|Status:/ {
      start=NR-3; if (start<1) start=1; end=NR+5
    }
    NR>=start && NR<=end { printf "%5d  %s\n", NR, $0 }
  ' start=0 end=0
done

echo '== pull request identity =='
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/$pr" \
  --jq '{number,state,merged,base:.base.sha,head:.head.sha,changed_files}'

echo '== exact-head pull-request workflow runs =='
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/actions/runs?event=pull_request&head_sha=$head&per_page=100" \
  --jq '.workflow_runs[] | {id,name,event,status,conclusion,head_sha,run_attempt}'

echo '== exact-head required check contexts =='
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/commits/$head/check-runs?per_page=100" \
  --jq '[.check_runs[] | select(.name == "rust" or .name == "assurance-proof" or .name == "scorecard") | {id,name,head_sha,status,conclusion,app_id:.app.id,app_slug:.app.slug}]'

echo '== exact-head artifacts =='
for run in 33083016604 33083016588; do
  echo "--- run=$run ---"
  gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run/artifacts?per_page=100" \
    --jq '.artifacts[] | {id,name,expired,digest,size_in_bytes}'
done

echo '== detailed rulesets =='
for ruleset in 21652953 21652974; do
  echo "--- ruleset=$ruleset ---"
  gh api "repos/$repo/rulesets/$ruleset" \
    --jq '{id,name,enforcement,target,conditions,bypass_actors,current_user_can_bypass,rules}'
done

echo '== review threads and reviews =='
gh api graphql -F owner='TheHalfMoon' -F name='commandF' -F number=52 -f query='
query($owner:String!, $name:String!, $number:Int!) {
  repository(owner:$owner,name:$name) {
    pullRequest(number:$number) {
      reviewThreads(first:100) {
        totalCount
        nodes {
          isResolved
          isOutdated
          comments(first:10) { nodes { author { login } body commit { oid } } }
        }
      }
      reviews(first:100) { nodes { author { login } state commit { oid } submittedAt } }
    }
  }
}' --jq '.data.repository.pullRequest'

echo '== T054/T055 PR and workflows =='
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/51" \
  --jq '{number,state,merged,merged_at,base:.base.sha,head:.head.sha,merge_commit_sha}'
for run in 33078356963 33078357039 33078357105 33078357068 33078356986 33079909197 33079909183; do
  gh api "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run" \
    --jq '{id,name,event,status,conclusion,head_sha}'
done

Length of output: 17263


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo='TheHalfMoon/commandF'
pr='52'
head='65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e'
tmp="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmp"' EXIT

echo '== exact closeout authority and T056 text =='
git show "$head:specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md" |
  awk 'NR >= 155 && NR <= 242 { printf "%5d  %s\n", NR, $0 }'

echo '== assurance artifact archive and retained source binding =='
gh api -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' \
  "repos/$repo/actions/artifacts/9651015794/zip" > "$tmp/assurance.zip"
sha256sum "$tmp/assurance.zip"
unzip -Z1 "$tmp/assurance.zip"
unzip -qq "$tmp/assurance.zip" -d "$tmp/assurance"
find "$tmp/assurance" -type f -print -exec sha256sum {} \;
find "$tmp/assurance" -type f \( -name 'assurance-summary.json' -o -name 'source.sha' -o -name 'source.tree' -o -name 'source.status' \) \
  -exec sh -c 'printf "\n--- %s ---\n" "$1"; cat "$1"' sh {} \;

echo '== scorecard artifact archive listing and exact-head binding text =='
gh api -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' \
  "repos/$repo/actions/artifacts/9650896516/zip" > "$tmp/scorecard.zip"
sha256sum "$tmp/scorecard.zip"
unzip -Z1 "$tmp/scorecard.zip"
unzip -p "$tmp/scorecard.zip" | strings | grep -F -C 3 "$head" || true

echo '== exact-head Qodo and CodeRabbit PR timeline evidence =='
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/issues/$pr/comments?per_page=100" \
  --jq --arg head "$head" '
    .[] | select(
      (.user.login | test("qodo|coderabbit"; "i")) or
      (.body | contains($head))
    ) | {id,user:.user.login,created_at,body}'

Length of output: 13874


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo='TheHalfMoon/commandF'
pr='52'
head='65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e'
tmp="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmp"' EXIT

echo '== source-status artifact semantics in workflow definition =='
git show "$head:.github/workflows/af01-assurance-proof.yml" |
  grep -n -E -C 4 'af01-source-status|source.*status|git status|clean' || true

echo '== scorecard artifact JSON =='
gh api -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' \
  "repos/$repo/actions/artifacts/9650896516/zip" > "$tmp/scorecard.zip"
python3 - "$tmp/scorecard.zip" <<'PY'
import json, sys, zipfile
archive = sys.argv[1]
with zipfile.ZipFile(archive) as z:
    for name in z.namelist():
        print(f"--- {name} ---")
        raw = z.read(name)
        try:
            value = json.loads(raw)
            print(json.dumps(value, indent=2, sort_keys=True))
        except (UnicodeDecodeError, json.JSONDecodeError):
            print(raw.decode("utf-8", errors="replace"))
PY

echo '== current-head automation comments =='
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/issues/$pr/comments?per_page=100" > "$tmp/comments.json"
python3 - "$tmp/comments.json" "$head" <<'PY'
import json, sys
comments = json.load(open(sys.argv[1]))
head = sys.argv[2]
for c in comments:
    login = c["user"]["login"]
    body = c.get("body", "")
    if ("qodo" in login.lower() or "coderabbit" in login.lower()
            or head in body):
        print(json.dumps({
            "id": c["id"], "user": login, "created_at": c["created_at"],
            "body": body
        }, indent=2))
PY

echo '== exact-head inline review comments =='
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/pulls/$pr/comments?per_page=100" > "$tmp/review-comments.json"
python3 - "$tmp/review-comments.json" "$head" <<'PY'
import json, sys
comments = json.load(open(sys.argv[1]))
head = sys.argv[2]
for c in comments:
    login = c["user"]["login"]
    body = c.get("body", "")
    if ("qodo" in login.lower() or "coderabbit" in login.lower()
            or c.get("commit_id") == head or head in body):
        print(json.dumps({
            "id": c["id"], "user": login, "commit_id": c.get("commit_id"),
            "path": c.get("path"), "line": c.get("line"), "body": body
        }, indent=2))
PY

Length of output: 59439


@TheHalfMoon, I found one substantive evidence issue.

  • Checkpoint 5440752132 states that Scorecard artifact 9650896516 has source SHA 65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e.
  • The artifact is retained by exact-head workflow run 33083016588. This proves workflow-run provenance for the exact head.
  • However, the artifact payload af01-scorecard-repository.json identifies its scanned repository commit as 652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028, which is the base main commit.
  • Therefore, the artifact does not itself bind the repository-level Scorecard result to 65d44c....

This is a false-PASS risk if the checkpoint treats the Scorecard payload as an exact-head source-binding proof. Correct the checkpoint to distinguish:

  1. exact-head workflow-run and artifact provenance; and
  2. the Scorecard repository scan target, which is canonical main at 652207....

This correction belongs in the PR checkpoint. It does not require a commit mutation.

All other requested evidence checks passed:

  • The exact head and tree match checkpoint 5440752132.
  • The comparison from 652207... is three commits ahead, zero behind, and changes exactly the two AF-01 documentation/task-state paths.
  • All five path-applicable pull-request workflows succeeded on 65d44c....
  • rust, assurance-proof, and scorecard each occur once as successful GitHub Actions check runs from integration 15368.
  • Assurance artifact 9651015794 is retained and unexpired. Its archive digest and assurance-summary.json digest match the checkpoint. The summary binds the exact head and tree. The empty af01-source-status.txt is valid clean-source evidence because the workflow requires that git status --porcelain output file to be empty.
  • PR #51, its convergence workflows, and its post-merge assurance and Scorecard runs match the T054/T055 record.
  • The updated authority wording correctly distinguishes owner-authorized ruleset administration data from permission-scoped reviewer-app responses that return null bypass fields. The available reviewer credential remains insufficient to disprove the owner-authorized bypass record.
  • Qodo’s current-head review in comment 5440762043 reports no substantive issue.
  • GitHub reports zero review threads.
  • The documents keep CLOSEOUT_CANDIDATE status and T056 open. They do not make a false AF-01=CLOSED_CANONICAL claim.

Disposition: T056 must remain open until the Scorecard evidence wording is corrected and the checkpoint is re-evaluated. No false-CLOSED_CANONICAL claim exists.

You are interacting with an AI system.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo='TheHalfMoon/commandF'
pr='52'
head='65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e'
base='652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028'

echo '== PR, exact commit, and compare =='
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/$pr" --jq '{number,state,merged,base:.base.sha,head:.head.sha}'
gh api "repos/$repo/git/commits/$head" --jq '{sha,tree:.tree.sha,parents:[.parents[].sha]}'
gh api "repos/$repo/compare/$base...$head" \
  --jq '{status,ahead_by,behind_by,total_commits,files:[.files[]|{filename,status,additions,deletions}]}'

echo '== exact-head changed document sections =='
for path in \
  specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md \
  specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/tasks.md
do
  echo "-- $path --"
  git show "$head:$path" | nl -ba | sed -n '1,360p'
done

echo '== exact-head pull-request workflow runs =='
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/actions/runs?event=pull_request&head_sha=$head&per_page=100" \
  --jq '.workflow_runs[] | {id,name,status,conclusion,head_sha,event,run_attempt}'

echo '== required contexts on exact head =='
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/commits/$head/check-runs?per_page=100" \
  --jq '[.check_runs[] | select(.name == "rust" or .name == "assurance-proof" or .name == "scorecard") | {id,name,status,conclusion,head_sha,app_id:.app.id,app_slug:.app.slug}]'

echo '== exact-head artifacts =='
for run in 33083016604 33083016588; do
  gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run/artifacts?per_page=100" \
    --jq --arg run "$run" '.artifacts[] | {run:$run,id,name,expired,digest}'
done

echo '== live detailed rulesets =='
for id in 21652953 21652974; do
  gh api "repos/$repo/rulesets/$id" \
    --jq '{id,name,enforcement,target,conditions,bypass_actors,current_user_can_bypass,rules}'
done

echo '== review-thread state =='
gh api graphql -F owner='TheHalfMoon' -F name='commandF' -F number="$pr" -f query='
query($owner:String!, $name:String!, $number:Int!) {
  repository(owner:$owner,name:$name) {
    pullRequest(number:$number) {
      reviewThreads(first:100) {
        totalCount
        nodes { isResolved isOutdated comments(first:10) { nodes { author { login } body commit { oid } } } }
      }
    }
  }
}' --jq '.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads'

echo '== T054/T055 historical merge and runs =='
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/51" --jq '{state,merged,merge_commit_sha,base:.base.sha,head:.head.sha}'
for run in 33078356963 33078357039 33078357105 33078357068 33078356986 33079909197 33079909183; do
  gh api "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run" --jq '{id,name,event,status,conclusion,head_sha}'
done

Length of output: 3689


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo='TheHalfMoon/commandF'
pr='52'
head='65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e'
tmp="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmp"' EXIT

echo '== changed documents at exact head =='
for path in \
  specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md \
  specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/tasks.md
do
  echo "-- $path --"
  git show "$head:$path" | awk '{printf "%6d  %s\n", NR, $0}'
done

echo '== exact-head pull-request workflow runs =='
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/actions/runs?event=pull_request&head_sha=$head&per_page=100" \
  --jq '.workflow_runs[] | {id,name,status,conclusion,head_sha,event,run_attempt}'

echo '== required contexts on exact head =='
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/commits/$head/check-runs?per_page=100" \
  --jq '[.check_runs[] | select(.name == "rust" or .name == "assurance-proof" or .name == "scorecard") | {id,name,status,conclusion,head_sha,app_id:.app.id,app_slug:.app.slug}]'

echo '== exact-head artifacts =='
for run in 33083016604 33083016588; do
  gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run/artifacts?per_page=100" \
    --jq --arg run "$run" '.artifacts[] | {run:$run,id,name,expired,digest}'
done

echo '== assurance artifact source binding =='
gh api -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' \
  "repos/$repo/actions/artifacts/9651015794/zip" > "$tmp/assurance.zip"
unzip -Z1 "$tmp/assurance.zip"
for entry in $(unzip -Z1 "$tmp/assurance.zip"); do
  case "$entry" in
    *assurance-summary.json|*source.sha|*source.tree|*source.status)
      echo "-- $entry --"
      unzip -p "$tmp/assurance.zip" "$entry"
      printf '\nsha256: '
      unzip -p "$tmp/assurance.zip" "$entry" | sha256sum | awk '{print $1}'
      ;;
  esac
done

echo '== live detailed rulesets =='
for id in 21652953 21652974; do
  gh api "repos/$repo/rulesets/$id" \
    --jq '{id,name,enforcement,target,conditions,bypass_actors,current_user_can_bypass,rules}'
done

echo '== review-thread state =='
gh api graphql -F owner='TheHalfMoon' -F name='commandF' -F number="$pr" -f query='
query($owner:String!, $name:String!, $number:Int!) {
  repository(owner:$owner,name:$name) {
    pullRequest(number:$number) {
      reviewThreads(first:100) {
        totalCount
        nodes { isResolved isOutdated comments(first:10) { nodes { author { login } body commit { oid } } } }
      }
    }
  }
}' --jq '.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads'

echo '== T054/T055 historical merge and runs =='
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/51" --jq '{state,merged,merge_commit_sha,base:.base.sha,head:.head.sha}'
for run in 33078356963 33078357039 33078357105 33078357068 33078356986 33079909197 33079909183; do
  gh api "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run" --jq '{id,name,event,status,conclusion,head_sha}'
done

Length of output: 31056


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo='TheHalfMoon/commandF'
pr='52'
head='65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e'
tmp="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmp"' EXIT

echo '== exact-head artifact metadata =='
for run in 33083016604 33083016588; do
  echo "-- run $run --"
  gh api "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run/artifacts?per_page=100" \
    --jq '.artifacts[] | {id,name,expired,digest,created_at,updated_at}'
done

echo '== assurance artifact binding =='
gh api -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' \
  "repos/$repo/actions/artifacts/9651015794/zip" > "$tmp/assurance.zip"
unzip -Z1 "$tmp/assurance.zip"
for entry in $(unzip -Z1 "$tmp/assurance.zip"); do
  case "$entry" in
    *assurance-summary.json|*source.sha|*source.tree|*source.status)
      echo "-- $entry --"
      unzip -p "$tmp/assurance.zip" "$entry"
      printf '\nsha256: '
      unzip -p "$tmp/assurance.zip" "$entry" | sha256sum | awk '{print $1}'
      ;;
  esac
done

echo '== live detailed rulesets =='
for id in 21652953 21652974; do
  echo "-- ruleset $id --"
  gh api "repos/$repo/rulesets/$id" \
    --jq '{id,name,enforcement,target,conditions,bypass_actors,current_user_can_bypass,rules}'
done

echo '== review-thread state =='
gh api graphql -F owner='TheHalfMoon' -F name='commandF' -F number="$pr" -f query='
query($owner:String!, $name:String!, $number:Int!) {
  repository(owner:$owner,name:$name) {
    pullRequest(number:$number) {
      reviewThreads(first:100) {
        totalCount
        nodes {
          isResolved
          isOutdated
          comments(first:10) { nodes { author { login } body commit { oid } } }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}' --jq '.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads'

echo '== current T056 checkpoint comment =='
gh api "repos/$repo/issues/comments/5440752132" \
  --jq '{id,user:.user.login,created_at,body}'

echo '== T054/T055 historical merge and runs =='
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/51" --jq '{state,merged,merge_commit_sha,base:.base.sha,head:.head.sha}'
for run in 33078356963 33078357039 33078357105 33078357068 33078356986 33079909197 33079909183; do
  gh api "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run" --jq '{id,name,event,status,conclusion,head_sha}'
done

Length of output: 14597


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo='TheHalfMoon/commandF'
tmp="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmp"' EXIT

echo '== assurance source status =='
gh api -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' \
  "repos/$repo/actions/artifacts/9651015794/zip" > "$tmp/assurance.zip"
for entry in $(unzip -Z1 "$tmp/assurance.zip"); do
  case "$entry" in
    *source-status*|*source.sha|*source.tree|*AF01_ASSURANCE_SHA256*)
      echo "-- $entry --"
      unzip -p "$tmp/assurance.zip" "$entry"
      printf '\nsha256: '
      unzip -p "$tmp/assurance.zip" "$entry" | sha256sum | awk '{print $1}'
      ;;
  esac
done

echo '== scorecard artifact source identity =='
gh api -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' \
  "repos/$repo/actions/artifacts/9650896516/zip" > "$tmp/scorecard.zip"
unzip -Z1 "$tmp/scorecard.zip"
for entry in $(unzip -Z1 "$tmp/scorecard.zip"); do
  echo "-- $entry --"
  unzip -p "$tmp/scorecard.zip" "$entry" | grep -E -i -C 2 \
    '65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e|source|commit|sha' || true
done

Length of output: 11986


@TheHalfMoon

Disposition: two substantive issues remain. Do not complete T056 or classify AF-01 as CLOSED_CANONICAL.

  1. The Scorecard artifact does not bind the exact PR head.
    Checkpoint 5440752132 states that artifact 9650896516 has source SHA 65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e. The downloaded artifact does not support that claim.

    • af01-scorecard-local.json records "repo":{"name":"file://.","commit":"unknown"}.
    • af01-scorecard-repository.json records commit 652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028, which is canonical main, not the PR head.

    The artifact proves that the Scorecard workflow ran on the exact PR head. It does not prove that its Scorecard reports analyzed that head. Remove or qualify the exact-head Scorecard source-SHA claim. If exact source binding is a T056 requirement, produce retained evidence that binds the report input to the PR head.

  2. The owner-authorized ruleset bypass evidence remains unavailable to this review.
    The direct detailed response available to this review for ruleset 21652974 returns:

    bypass_actors: null
    current_user_can_bypass: never
    

    The revised text correctly avoids treating this permission-scoped response as proof that the owner-visible bypass is absent. However, checkpoint 5440752132 only asserts the different owner-authorized response. It does not retain the owner-authorized response or another independently verifiable record of its authorization and values.

    Therefore, I cannot verify the claimed RepositoryRole actor 5, pull_request bypass, or pull_requests_only state. This is an unverified live-policy claim, not proof that the bypass is absent. Do not treat unavailable owner-only evidence as PASS.

I verified the remaining requested facts:

  • The exact SHA and tree match the checkpoint.
  • The compare is three commits ahead, zero behind, and changes only the two AF-01 documentation paths.
  • All five path-applicable pull-request workflows succeeded on the exact head.
  • Each required context is unique and successful on the exact head from GitHub Actions app 15368.
  • The assurance artifact is retained. Its digest and AF01_ASSURANCE_SHA256 match the checkpoint. Its summary binds the exact SHA and tree. The empty source-status file is consistent with a clean porcelain status.
  • T054 and T055 workflow and merge history match the retained record.
  • GitHub reports zero review threads.
  • The non-circular temporal-evidence wording is correct.
  • The documents keep T056 open and do not currently make a false AF-01=CLOSED_CANONICAL claim.

The two evidence gaps create a false-PASS risk. The current gate state must remain:

T056: STILL OPEN
AF-01: NOT YET CLOSED_CANONICAL

You are interacting with an AI system.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@coderabbitai

Please re-evaluate unchanged exact head 65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e after checkpoint 5440752132 was corrected in place. The checkpoint now explicitly states that the Scorecard workflow/check is exact-head terminal provenance, while af01-scorecard-repository.json internally scans canonical base commit 652207aa... and is supplemental repository-posture evidence only; exact source/tree binding comes from assurance artifact 9651015794. No repository commit changed. State whether your sole substantive finding is resolved and whether any other substantive or false-closure risk remains.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo='TheHalfMoon/commandF'
pr='52'
head='65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e'
base='652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028'
tmp="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmp"' EXIT

echo '== PR and exact commit identity =='
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/$pr" \
  --jq '{number,state,merged,base:.base.sha,head:.head.sha,changed_files}'
gh api "repos/$repo/git/commits/$head" \
  --jq '{sha,tree:.tree.sha,parents:[.parents[].sha]}'
gh api "repos/$repo/compare/$base...$head" \
  --jq '{status,ahead_by,behind_by,total_commits,files:[.files[]|{filename,status}]}'

echo '== current checkpoint =='
gh api 'repos/TheHalfMoon/commandF/issues/comments/5440752132' \
  --jq '{id,updated_at,body}'

echo '== exact-head closeout and task state =='
for path in \
  specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md \
  specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/tasks.md
do
  echo "--- $path ---"
  git show "$head:$path" | nl -ba | \
    grep -E -C 3 'T054|T055|T056|CLOSED_CANONICAL|CLOSEOUT_CANDIDATE|Scorecard|scorecard|assurance|owner-authorized|redacted'
done

echo '== exact-head workflow and required-context provenance =='
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/actions/runs?event=pull_request&head_sha=$head&per_page=100" \
  --jq '.workflow_runs[] | select(.id == 33083016573 or .id == 33083016577 or .id == 33083016641 or .id == 33083016588 or .id == 33083016604) | {id,name,event,status,conclusion,head_sha}'
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/commits/$head/check-runs?per_page=100" \
  --jq '[.check_runs[] | select(.name == "rust" or .name == "assurance-proof" or .name == "scorecard") | {id,name,status,conclusion,head_sha,app_id:.app.id}]'

echo '== exact-head artifact metadata and assurance binding =='
for run in 33083016604 33083016588; do
  gh api "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run/artifacts?per_page=100" \
    --jq --arg run "$run" '.artifacts[] | {run:$run,id,name,expired,digest}'
done
gh api -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' \
  "repos/$repo/actions/artifacts/9651015794/zip" > "$tmp/assurance.zip"
unzip -Z1 "$tmp/assurance.zip"
for entry in $(unzip -Z1 "$tmp/assurance.zip"); do
  case "$entry" in
    *assurance-summary.json|*source.sha|*source.tree|*source-status*)
      echo "--- $entry ---"
      unzip -p "$tmp/assurance.zip" "$entry"
      ;;
  esac
done

echo '== current review-thread state =='
gh api graphql -F owner='TheHalfMoon' -F name='commandF' -F number="$pr" -f query='
query($owner:String!, $name:String!, $number:Int!) {
  repository(owner:$owner,name:$name) {
    pullRequest(number:$number) {
      reviewThreads(first:100) {
        totalCount
        nodes { isResolved isOutdated comments(first:10) { nodes { author { login } } } }
      }
    }
  }
}' --jq '.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads'

Length of output: 9919


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo='TheHalfMoon/commandF'
pr='52'
head='65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e'
tmp="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmp"' EXIT

echo '== exact-head document task and closure state =='
for path in \
  specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md \
  specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/tasks.md
do
  echo "--- $path ---"
  git show "$head:$path" | awk '
    /T054|T055|T056|CLOSED_CANONICAL|CLOSEOUT_CANDIDATE|Status:/ {
      for (i=NR-2; i<=NR+3; i++) wanted[i]=1
    }
    { lines[NR]=$0 }
    END { for (i=1; i<=NR; i++) if (wanted[i]) printf "%d  %s\n", i, lines[i] }
  '
done

echo '== exact-head workflow provenance =='
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/actions/runs?event=pull_request&head_sha=$head&per_page=100" \
  --jq '.workflow_runs[]
    | select(.id == 33083016573 or .id == 33083016577 or .id == 33083016641 or .id == 33083016588 or .id == 33083016604)
    | {id,name,event,status,conclusion,head_sha}'

echo '== required contexts =='
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/commits/$head/check-runs?per_page=100" \
  --jq '[.check_runs[]
    | select(.name == "rust" or .name == "assurance-proof" or .name == "scorecard")
    | {id,name,status,conclusion,head_sha,app_id:.app.id}]'

echo '== artifact metadata =='
for run in 33083016604 33083016588; do
  gh api "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run/artifacts?per_page=100" \
    --jq --arg run "$run" '.artifacts[] | {run:$run,id,name,expired,digest}'
done

echo '== assurance source binding =='
gh api -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' \
  "repos/$repo/actions/artifacts/9651015794/zip" > "$tmp/assurance.zip"
unzip -Z1 "$tmp/assurance.zip"
while IFS= read -r entry; do
  case "$entry" in
    *assurance-summary.json|*source.sha|*source.tree|*source-status*)
      echo "--- $entry ---"
      unzip -p "$tmp/assurance.zip" "$entry"
      printf '\n'
      ;;
  esac
done < <(unzip -Z1 "$tmp/assurance.zip")

echo '== scorecard payload scopes =='
gh api -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' \
  "repos/$repo/actions/artifacts/9650896516/zip" > "$tmp/scorecard.zip"
while IFS= read -r entry; do
  echo "--- $entry ---"
  unzip -p "$tmp/scorecard.zip" "$entry" | grep -E -i -C 2 \
    'repo|commit|65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e|652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028' \
    || true
done < <(unzip -Z1 "$tmp/scorecard.zip")

echo '== review threads =='
gh api graphql -F owner='TheHalfMoon' -F name='commandF' -F number="$pr" -f query='
query($owner:String!, $name:String!, $number:Int!) {
  repository(owner:$owner,name:$name) {
    pullRequest(number:$number) {
      reviewThreads(first:100) {
        totalCount
        nodes { isResolved isOutdated }
      }
    }
  }
}' --jq '.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads'

Length of output: 12419


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo='TheHalfMoon/commandF'
pr='52'
tmp="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmp"' EXIT

echo '== artifact metadata =='
for run in 33083016604 33083016588; do
  echo "--- workflow run $run ---"
  gh api "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run/artifacts?per_page=100" \
    --jq '.artifacts[] | {id,name,expired,digest}'
done

echo '== assurance artifact source binding =='
gh api -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' \
  "repos/$repo/actions/artifacts/9651015794/zip" > "$tmp/assurance.zip"
while IFS= read -r entry; do
  case "$entry" in
    *assurance-summary.json|*source.sha|*source.tree|*source-status*)
      echo "--- $entry ---"
      unzip -p "$tmp/assurance.zip" "$entry"
      printf '\n'
      ;;
  esac
done < <(unzip -Z1 "$tmp/assurance.zip")

echo '== Scorecard payload scopes =='
gh api -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' \
  "repos/$repo/actions/artifacts/9650896516/zip" > "$tmp/scorecard.zip"
while IFS= read -r entry; do
  echo "--- $entry ---"
  unzip -p "$tmp/scorecard.zip" "$entry" | grep -E -i -C 2 \
    'repo|commit|65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e|652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028' \
    || true
done < <(unzip -Z1 "$tmp/scorecard.zip")

echo '== review threads =='
gh api graphql -F owner='TheHalfMoon' -F name='commandF' -F number="$pr" -f query='
query($owner:String!, $name:String!, $number:Int!) {
  repository(owner:$owner,name:$name) {
    pullRequest(number:$number) {
      reviewThreads(first:100) {
        totalCount
        nodes { isResolved isOutdated }
      }
    }
  }
}' --jq '.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads'

Length of output: 2532


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo='TheHalfMoon/commandF'
pr='52'
tmp="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmp"' EXIT

echo '== download and inspect assurance artifact =='
mkdir "$tmp/assurance"
gh run download 33083016604 --repo "$repo" \
  --name 'af01-assurance-proof' --dir "$tmp/assurance"
find "$tmp/assurance" -type f -print
find "$tmp/assurance" -type f \( -name 'assurance-summary.json' -o -name 'source.sha' -o -name 'source.tree' -o -name '*source-status*' \) \
  -exec sh -c 'echo "--- $1 ---"; cat "$1"; printf "\n"' sh {} \;

echo '== download and inspect Scorecard artifact =='
mkdir "$tmp/scorecard"
gh run download 33083016588 --repo "$repo" \
  --name 'af01-scorecard' --dir "$tmp/scorecard"
find "$tmp/scorecard" -type f -print
find "$tmp/scorecard" -type f -exec sh -c \
  'echo "--- $1 ---"; grep -E -i -C 2 "repo|commit|65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e|652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028" "$1" || true' \
  sh {} \;

echo '== review threads =='
gh api graphql -F owner='TheHalfMoon' -F name='commandF' -F number="$pr" -f query='
query($owner:String!, $name:String!, $number:Int!) {
  repository(owner:$owner,name:$name) {
    pullRequest(number:$number) {
      reviewThreads(first:100) {
        totalCount
        nodes { isResolved isOutdated }
      }
    }
  }
}' --jq '.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads'

Length of output: 17228


@TheHalfMoon

The Scorecard finding is resolved.

Checkpoint 5440752132 now correctly distinguishes the evidence scopes:

  • Workflow run 33083016588 and check run 98555034042 prove that the required scorecard context completed successfully on exact head 65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e.
  • Artifact 9650896516 is retained and has the stated GitHub digest.
  • af01-scorecard-repository.json scans canonical main commit 652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028.
  • The Scorecard artifact is supplemental repository-posture evidence only.
  • Assurance artifact 9651015794 binds the exact candidate SHA and tree. Its assurance-summary.json records SHA 65d44c... and tree a7cac5.... Its source-status file is empty.

I also verified:

  • The exact base-to-head comparison is three commits ahead, zero behind, and changes only the two AF-01 documentation paths.
  • All five path-applicable pull-request workflows succeeded on the exact head.
  • rust, assurance-proof, and scorecard each have one successful GitHub Actions check run with app ID 15368.
  • Both artifacts are retained and unexpired.
  • GitHub reports zero review threads.
  • closeout.md and tasks.md retain CLOSEOUT_CANDIDATE.
  • T056 remains open.
  • The documents do not make a current false AF-01=CLOSED_CANONICAL claim.

One substantive evidence limitation remains. The owner-authorized bypass values for ruleset 21652974 remain unavailable to the reviewer credential. Checkpoint 5440752132 asserts the owner-authorized result, but it does not retain the owner-authorized API response or another independently verifiable record. I cannot treat that live-policy assertion as verified. T056 must remain open until the required owner-authorized policy evidence is independently available or retained.


If you found this review helpful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X?

Thank you for using CodeRabbit!

You are interacting with an AI system.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

AF-01 T056 retained owner-authorized live-policy evidence

This comment retains the raw owner-authorized ruleset read-back that CodeRabbit requested as independently inspectable PR evidence. It does not mutate repository content or the candidate head.

Captured during the current T056 qualification session on 2026-08-27T17:47+03:00.

Exact closeout head remains:

65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e

Canonical main remains:

652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028

Owner-authorized detailed endpoint — assurance ruleset

Endpoint:

GET /repos/TheHalfMoon/commandF/rulesets/21652953

Retained response fields:

{
  "id": 21652953,
  "name": "commandF main assurance",
  "target": "branch",
  "source_type": "Repository",
  "source": "TheHalfMoon/commandF",
  "enforcement": "active",
  "conditions": {
    "ref_name": {
      "exclude": [],
      "include": ["refs/heads/main"]
    }
  },
  "rules": [
    {"type": "deletion"},
    {"type": "non_fast_forward"},
    {
      "type": "required_status_checks",
      "parameters": {
        "strict_required_status_checks_policy": true,
        "do_not_enforce_on_create": false,
        "required_status_checks": [
          {"context": "rust", "integration_id": 15368},
          {"context": "assurance-proof", "integration_id": 15368},
          {"context": "scorecard", "integration_id": 15368}
        ]
      }
    }
  ],
  "bypass_actors": [],
  "current_user_can_bypass": "never"
}

Owner-authorized detailed endpoint — review-governance ruleset

Endpoint:

GET /repos/TheHalfMoon/commandF/rulesets/21652974

Retained response fields:

{
  "id": 21652974,
  "name": "commandF main review governance",
  "target": "branch",
  "source_type": "Repository",
  "source": "TheHalfMoon/commandF",
  "enforcement": "active",
  "conditions": {
    "ref_name": {
      "exclude": [],
      "include": ["refs/heads/main"]
    }
  },
  "rules": [
    {
      "type": "pull_request",
      "parameters": {
        "required_approving_review_count": 1,
        "dismiss_stale_reviews_on_push": true,
        "required_reviewers": [],
        "require_code_owner_review": true,
        "require_last_push_approval": true,
        "required_review_thread_resolution": true,
        "require_extra_approval_for_unattributed_changes": true,
        "allowed_merge_methods": ["merge"]
      }
    }
  ],
  "bypass_actors": [
    {
      "actor_id": 5,
      "actor_type": "RepositoryRole",
      "bypass_mode": "pull_request"
    }
  ],
  "current_user_can_bypass": "pull_requests_only"
}

This retained record is the owner-authorized administration-field evidence for T056. Reviewer-app credentials may expose a permission-redacted/null bypass_actors field; that narrower view does not supersede the owner-authorized detailed endpoint above.

T056 remains open pending final CodeRabbit disposition and guarded merge/post-merge verification.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@coderabbitai review

Please perform the final exact-head re-evaluation of unchanged 65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e using qualification checkpoint 5440752132 and retained owner-authorized live-policy evidence comment 5440874428.

Your prior Scorecard finding is already resolved. The remaining limitation you identified was that the owner-authorized 21652974 bypass response was asserted but not retained. Comment 5440874428 now retains the raw relevant response fields from both owner-authorized detailed ruleset endpoints, including bypass_actors and current_user_can_bypass, without changing the repository head.

Please state explicitly whether that remaining substantive limitation is resolved and whether any other substantive issue or false-closure risk remains. T056 remains open pending your disposition and guarded merge/post-merge verification.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo='TheHalfMoon/commandF'
pr='52'
head='65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e'
base='652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028'
checkpoint='5440752132'
policy_comment='5440874428'
tmp="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmp"' EXIT

echo '== PR / exact commit / compare =='
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/$pr" \
  --jq '{number,state,merged,base:.base.sha,head:.head.sha,changed_files}'
gh api "repos/$repo/git/commits/$head" \
  --jq '{sha,tree:.tree.sha,parents:[.parents[].sha]}'
gh api "repos/$repo/compare/$base...$head" \
  --jq '{status,ahead_by,behind_by,total_commits,files:[.files[]|{filename,status}]}'

echo '== T056 checkpoint and retained owner-authorized policy evidence =='
for id in "$checkpoint" "$policy_comment"; do
  gh api "repos/$repo/issues/comments/$id" \
    --jq '{id,user:.user.login,created_at,updated_at,body}'
done

echo '== exact-head task and closeout state =='
for path in \
  specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md \
  specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/tasks.md
do
  echo "--- $path ---"
  git show "$head:$path" | nl -ba | grep -E -C 3 \
    'T054|T055|T056|CLOSED_CANONICAL|CLOSEOUT_CANDIDATE|owner-authorized|redacted|Scorecard|scorecard|assurance'
done

echo '== exact-head pull-request workflow runs =='
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/actions/runs?event=pull_request&head_sha=$head&per_page=100" \
  --jq '.workflow_runs[]
    | select(.id == 33083016573 or .id == 33083016577 or .id == 33083016641 or .id == 33083016588 or .id == 33083016604)
    | {id,name,event,status,conclusion,head_sha,run_attempt}'

echo '== exact-head required contexts =='
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/commits/$head/check-runs?per_page=100" \
  --jq '[.check_runs[]
    | select(.name == "rust" or .name == "assurance-proof" or .name == "scorecard")
    | {id,name,status,conclusion,head_sha,app_id:.app.id,app_slug:.app.slug}]'

echo '== artifact metadata and assurance source/tree binding =='
for run in 33083016604 33083016588; do
  gh api "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run/artifacts?per_page=100" \
    --jq --arg run "$run" '.artifacts[] | {run:$run,id,name,expired,digest}'
done
gh api -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' \
  "repos/$repo/actions/artifacts/9651015794/zip" > "$tmp/assurance.zip"
while IFS= read -r entry; do
  case "$entry" in
    *assurance-summary.json|*source.sha|*source.tree|*source-status*)
      echo "--- $entry ---"
      unzip -p "$tmp/assurance.zip" "$entry"
      printf '\n'
      ;;
  esac
done < <(unzip -Z1 "$tmp/assurance.zip")

echo '== current detailed rulesets from reviewer credential =='
for id in 21652953 21652974; do
  echo "--- ruleset $id ---"
  gh api "repos/$repo/rulesets/$id" \
    --jq '{id,name,enforcement,target,conditions,bypass_actors,current_user_can_bypass,rules}'
done

echo '== review threads =='
gh api graphql -F owner='TheHalfMoon' -F name='commandF' -F number="$pr" -f query='
query($owner:String!, $name:String!, $number:Int!) {
  repository(owner:$owner,name:$name) {
    pullRequest(number:$number) {
      reviewThreads(first:100) {
        totalCount
        nodes { isResolved isOutdated comments(first:10) { nodes { author { login } } } }
      }
    }
  }
}' --jq '.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads'

echo '== T054/T055 historical merge and runs =='
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/51" \
  --jq '{state,merged,merge_commit_sha,base:.base.sha,head:.head.sha}'
for run in 33078356963 33078357039 33078357105 33078357068 33078356986 33079909197 33079909183; do
  gh api "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run" \
    --jq '{id,name,event,status,conclusion,head_sha}'
done

Length of output: 14217


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo='TheHalfMoon/commandF'
pr='52'
head='65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e'
tmp="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmp"' EXIT

echo '== exact-head closeout and task-state excerpts =='
for path in \
  specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/closeout.md \
  specs/015-af-01-trusted-development-baseline/tasks.md
do
  echo "--- $path ---"
  git show "$head:$path" | awk '{printf "%d  %s\n", NR, $0}' | grep -E -C 3 \
    'T054|T055|T056|CLOSED_CANONICAL|CLOSEOUT_CANDIDATE|owner-authorized|redacted|Scorecard|scorecard|assurance'
done

echo '== exact-head pull-request workflow runs =='
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/actions/runs?event=pull_request&head_sha=$head&per_page=100" \
  --jq '.workflow_runs[]
    | select(.id == 33083016573 or .id == 33083016577 or .id == 33083016641 or .id == 33083016588 or .id == 33083016604)
    | {id,name,event,status,conclusion,head_sha,run_attempt}'

echo '== exact-head required contexts =='
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/commits/$head/check-runs?per_page=100" \
  --jq '[.check_runs[]
    | select(.name == "rust" or .name == "assurance-proof" or .name == "scorecard")
    | {id,name,status,conclusion,head_sha,app_id:.app.id,app_slug:.app.slug}]'

echo '== artifact metadata =='
for run in 33083016604 33083016588; do
  gh api "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run/artifacts?per_page=100" \
    --jq --arg run "$run" '.artifacts[] | {run:$run,id,name,expired,digest}'
done

echo '== assurance artifact source/tree binding =='
gh api -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' \
  "repos/$repo/actions/artifacts/9651015794/zip" > "$tmp/assurance.zip"
while IFS= read -r entry; do
  case "$entry" in
    *assurance-summary.json|*source.sha|*source.tree|*source-status*)
      echo "--- $entry ---"
      unzip -p "$tmp/assurance.zip" "$entry"
      printf '\n'
      ;;
  esac
done < <(unzip -Z1 "$tmp/assurance.zip")

echo '== scorecard artifact scopes =='
gh api -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' \
  "repos/$repo/actions/artifacts/9650896516/zip" > "$tmp/scorecard.zip"
while IFS= read -r entry; do
  echo "--- $entry ---"
  unzip -p "$tmp/scorecard.zip" "$entry" | grep -E -i -C 2 \
    'repo|commit|65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e|652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028' \
    || true
done < <(unzip -Z1 "$tmp/scorecard.zip")

echo '== current detailed rulesets from reviewer credential =='
for id in 21652953 21652974; do
  echo "--- ruleset $id ---"
  gh api "repos/$repo/rulesets/$id" \
    --jq '{id,name,enforcement,target,conditions,bypass_actors,current_user_can_bypass,rules}'
done

echo '== review threads =='
gh api graphql -F owner='TheHalfMoon' -F name='commandF' -F number="$pr" -f query='
query($owner:String!, $name:String!, $number:Int!) {
  repository(owner:$owner,name:$name) {
    pullRequest(number:$number) {
      reviewThreads(first:100) {
        totalCount
        nodes { isResolved isOutdated comments(first:10) { nodes { author { login } } } }
      }
    }
  }
}' --jq '.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads'

echo '== T054/T055 historical merge and runs =='
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/51" \
  --jq '{state,merged,merge_commit_sha,base:.base.sha,head:.head.sha}'
for run in 33078356963 33078357039 33078357105 33078357068 33078356986 33079909197 33079909183; do
  gh api "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run" \
    --jq '{id,name,event,status,conclusion,head_sha}'
done

Length of output: 20578


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo='TheHalfMoon/commandF'
pr='52'
head='65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e'
tmp="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmp"' EXIT

echo '== artifact metadata =='
for run in 33083016604 33083016588; do
  echo "--- workflow run $run ---"
  gh api "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run/artifacts?per_page=100" \
    --jq '.artifacts[] | {id,name,expired,digest}'
done

echo '== assurance artifact source/tree binding =='
gh api -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' \
  "repos/$repo/actions/artifacts/9651015794/zip" > "$tmp/assurance.zip"
while IFS= read -r entry; do
  case "$entry" in
    *assurance-summary.json|*source.sha|*source.tree|*source-status*)
      echo "--- $entry ---"
      unzip -p "$tmp/assurance.zip" "$entry"
      printf '\n'
      ;;
  esac
done < <(unzip -Z1 "$tmp/assurance.zip")

echo '== scorecard artifact evidence scopes =='
gh api -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' \
  "repos/$repo/actions/artifacts/9650896516/zip" > "$tmp/scorecard.zip"
while IFS= read -r entry; do
  echo "--- $entry ---"
  unzip -p "$tmp/scorecard.zip" "$entry" | grep -E -i -C 2 \
    'repo|commit|65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e|652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028' \
    || true
done < <(unzip -Z1 "$tmp/scorecard.zip")

echo '== detailed rulesets from reviewer credential =='
for id in 21652953 21652974; do
  echo "--- ruleset $id ---"
  gh api "repos/$repo/rulesets/$id" \
    --jq '{id,name,enforcement,target,conditions,bypass_actors,current_user_can_bypass,rules}'
done

echo '== review-thread state =='
gh api graphql -F owner='TheHalfMoon' -F name='commandF' -F number="$pr" -f query='
query($owner:String!, $name:String!, $number:Int!) {
  repository(owner:$owner,name:$name) {
    pullRequest(number:$number) {
      reviewThreads(first:100) {
        totalCount
        nodes { isResolved isOutdated }
      }
    }
  }
}' --jq '.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads'

echo '== T054/T055 merge and workflow history =='
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/51" \
  --jq '{state,merged,merge_commit_sha,base:.base.sha,head:.head.sha}'
for run in 33078356963 33078357039 33078357105 33078357068 33078356986 33079909197 33079909183; do
  gh api "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run" \
    --jq '{id,name,event,status,conclusion,head_sha}'
done

Length of output: 3216


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo='TheHalfMoon/commandF'
pr='52'
head='65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e'
tmp="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmp"' EXIT

echo '== downloaded assurance artifact binding =='
mkdir -p "$tmp/assurance"
gh run download 33083016604 --repo "$repo" \
  --name 'af01-assurance-proof' --dir "$tmp/assurance"
find "$tmp/assurance" -type f -print
find "$tmp/assurance" -type f \( \
  -name 'assurance-summary.json' -o -name 'source.sha' -o \
  -name 'source.tree' -o -name '*source-status*' \
\) -exec sh -c 'echo "--- $1 ---"; cat "$1"; printf "\n"' sh {} \;

echo '== downloaded Scorecard artifact scopes =='
mkdir -p "$tmp/scorecard"
gh run download 33083016588 --repo "$repo" \
  --name 'af01-scorecard' --dir "$tmp/scorecard"
find "$tmp/scorecard" -type f -print
find "$tmp/scorecard" -type f -exec sh -c \
  'echo "--- $1 ---"; grep -E -i -C 2 "repo|commit|65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e|652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028" "$1" || true' \
  sh {} \;

echo '== detailed rulesets from reviewer credential =='
for id in 21652953 21652974; do
  echo "--- ruleset $id ---"
  gh api "repos/$repo/rulesets/$id" \
    --jq '{id,name,enforcement,target,conditions,bypass_actors,current_user_can_bypass,rules}'
done

echo '== review-thread state =='
gh api graphql -F owner='TheHalfMoon' -F name='commandF' -F number="$pr" -f query='
query($owner:String!, $name:String!, $number:Int!) {
  repository(owner:$owner,name:$name) {
    pullRequest(number:$number) {
      reviewThreads(first:100) {
        totalCount
        nodes { isResolved isOutdated }
      }
    }
  }
}' --jq '.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads'

echo '== T054/T055 merge and workflow history =='
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/51" \
  --jq '{state,merged,merge_commit_sha,base:.base.sha,head:.head.sha}'
for run in 33078356963 33078357039 33078357105 33078357068 33078356986 33079909197 33079909183; do
  gh api "repos/$repo/actions/runs/$run" \
    --jq '{id,name,event,status,conclusion,head_sha}'
done

Length of output: 20500


@TheHalfMoon

Disposition: the remaining owner-authorized live-policy evidence limitation is resolved.

Comment 5440874428 retains the relevant raw fields from the owner-authorized detailed endpoints for rulesets 21652953 and 21652974. This record supplies the previously missing inspectable evidence for:

  • assurance-ruleset bypass state: no bypass actors and current_user_can_bypass: never;
  • review-governance bypass state: RepositoryRole actor 5, bypass_mode: pull_request, and current_user_can_bypass: pull_requests_only;
  • active enforcement and refs/heads/main scope;
  • required status-check integration bindings and review-governance controls.

The reviewer credential still returns redacted/null bypass fields. That permission-scoped result does not contradict the retained owner-authorized response.

I also verified the following facts for exact head 65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e:

  • The tree is a7cac5a52d7a6b2b4d89b17018d084c835de312c.
  • The comparison from 652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028 is three commits ahead, zero behind, and changes only the two AF-01 documentation/task-state paths.
  • All five path-applicable pull-request workflows completed successfully on this head.
  • rust, assurance-proof, and scorecard are each unique, successful GitHub Actions contexts from app 15368.
  • Assurance artifact 9651015794 is retained and binds the exact source SHA and tree. Its source-status record is empty.
  • Scorecard artifact 9650896516 is retained. The checkpoint correctly limits it to exact-head workflow/check provenance and supplemental repository-posture evidence. Its repository payload scans canonical main, not the PR head.
  • T054 and T055 merge and workflow history match the retained record.
  • GitHub reports zero review threads.

I found no remaining substantive issue and no current false-PASS risk in the retained qualification evidence.

There is also no false-AF-01=CLOSED_CANONICAL claim. closeout.md and tasks.md retain CLOSEOUT_CANDIDATE, and T056 remains open.

T056 still requires the guarded merge of this unchanged exact head and the required post-merge canonical and live-policy verification.

You are interacting with an AI system.

@TheHalfMoon
TheHalfMoon merged commit b494cc2 into main Aug 27, 2026
12 checks passed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

AF-01 T056 post-merge canonical verification

The exact docs-only closeout candidate qualified unchanged at head 65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e and was merged with an exact expected-head guard.

Canonical post-merge identity:

PR: #52
merged: true
merge/main: b494cc2f76a3acf1b30770b6c986fefa1f314e35
tree: a7cac5a52d7a6b2b4d89b17018d084c835de312c
parent 1: 652207aaed1d9a28f3a326ca92e8fd93229fd028
parent 2: 65d44c9050e92236ae49c0e8537adc79e178d14e

The merge tree is exactly the qualified closeout-head tree.

Post-merge push proof

af01-scorecard
  run: 33084634090
  event: push
  head_sha: b494cc2f76a3acf1b30770b6c986fefa1f314e35
  result: completed/success
  artifact: 9651594247
  GitHub digest: sha256:2bfa053889ad078507792472f7134c324cb3eb139a052297110d66c3030b7c46

af01-assurance-proof
  run: 33084634098
  job/check: 98560815472
  event: push
  head_sha: b494cc2f76a3acf1b30770b6c986fefa1f314e35
  result: completed/success
  artifact: 9651712618
  GitHub digest: sha256:5c3566d096e77c5128bd591bd27eff5dbda0827715a3b5e0382df98fc01202c7
  AF01_ASSURANCE_SHA256: 755851fa5557a698c2c504c235e9d0b5947a92a15b680fb2bd5a053e675df0be
  assurance-summary.json sha256: 755851fa5557a698c2c504c235e9d0b5947a92a15b680fb2bd5a053e675df0be
  source.sha: b494cc2f76a3acf1b30770b6c986fefa1f314e35
  source.tree: a7cac5a52d7a6b2b4d89b17018d084c835de312c
  source status: clean

Every substantive assurance step succeeded, including the exact-source counterexamples, workflow-trust evidence, deterministic dependency evidence, cargo-deny, cargo-audit/RustSec, zizmor, deterministic summary construction, and artifact retention.

Final live-policy read-back

Ruleset 21652953 remains active on refs/heads/main, has no bypass actors, blocks deletion/non-fast-forward, and requires strict integration-bound rust, assurance-proof, and scorecard contexts from GitHub Actions app 15368.

Ruleset 21652974 remains active on refs/heads/main with the reviewed PR governance controls and owner-authorized PR-only RepositoryRole actor 5 bypass; current_user_can_bypass=pull_requests_only.

T056 disposition

All seven T056 conditions defined in canonical closeout.md are now complete for the exact closeout candidate and its merge. Therefore the AF-01 task-state condition is evidence-complete and canonical repository truth may now classify:

T056=COMPLETE
AF-01=CLOSED_CANONICAL

A separate docs-only state-reconciliation PR may update the checked-in task ledger to reflect this already-established canonical result. That reconciliation is not a new T056 precondition.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant